More time for patients. More clarity for your practice.Let’s talk: (248) 686-1357
Book a call ↗

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Not client results.

A sample
audit report.

What the written report looks like after a free audit call, shown for Northfield Family Medicine, a fictional practice.

Every name, encounter ID and figure on this page is made up. The figures show how the report is laid out. They don’t describe any real practice, and they aren’t results Highview has achieved.

A real report uses your own billing data, reviewed under a signed business associate agreement (BAA), and covers the areas agreed on the free audit call.

About this report

Practice
Northfield Family Medicine (fictional)
Specialty
Family medicine
Providers
3
Period reviewed
12 months
Visits
8,177
Claims billed
8,060

A fictional practice. All names, encounter IDs and figures are synthetic.

1 Claims by status

Every claim billed in the period, by where it stands today.

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Claims by status, 12 months
StatusClaimsBilled chargesOpen balance
Paid in full6,877$1,472,602$0
Paid, patient balance due424$89,627$28,950
Open with insurer618$130,605$130,605
Denied, not yet resolved141$31,061$31,061
Total8,060$1,723,895$190,616

Open balances are shown at billed charges. What a payer allows is usually lower. Visits that were never billed aren’t claims yet; they’re in section 5.

2 Open balances

The open balance from section 1, split three ways so it’s clear what needs follow-up: recent insurer claims, older insurer balances, and what patients owe.

Recent insurer claims

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Insurer claims open 0–45 days
AgeClaimsBalance at billed chargesNo payer acknowledgementAlready denied
0–45 days561$119,1595522

What needs follow-up: Most of these are within normal payer processing time and need no action yet. Follow up now on the 55 with no payer acknowledgement and the 22 already denied.

Older insurer balances, by age

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Insurer balances older than 45 days, by age
Age bandClaimsBalance at billed chargesOf which deniedNext step
46–90 days55$11,28730Past typical payer processing time. Check each claim’s status and work any denials.
91–180 days62$13,66443Needs a status check and, where a claim was denied, a corrected claim or an appeal.
181–365 days81$17,55646Check each claim against the payer’s filing limit first; some may no longer be collectible.
Total198$42,507119

What needs follow-up: 66 of these claims are already past the payer’s filing limit. They stay in the bands above so the totals reconcile, but they may not be collectible unless there is proof the claim was filed in time.

Patient responsibility

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Patient balances after the insurer has paid
AgeClaimsPatient balance
0–45 days63$4,815
Over 45 days361$24,135
Total424$28,950

What needs follow-up: Copays, coinsurance and deductibles the insurer has already processed. These are collected through patient statements, not payer follow-up, so they are kept separate.

3 Claims nearing filing deadlines

Insurer claims that still need a clean claim on file, with 30 days or fewer left before the payer’s filing limit. These are worked first.

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Claims within 30 days of the filing limit, by payer
PayerFiling limit used (days)ClaimsBilled charges
Medicare3653$430
Medicaid plan A1802$555
Commercial payer A905$985
Commercial payer B1803$640
Total13$2,610
Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Soonest deadlines
EncounterPayerIssueDays since visitFiling limitDays remainingCharge
S-006373Commercial payer ANot on file with payer82908$160
S-006401Commercial payer ANot on file with payer81909$160
S-000234MedicareNot on file with payer35436511$110
S-004504Medicaid plan ADenied: missing or invalid information16518015$265
S-004508Commercial payer BDenied: eligibility or coverage16518015$160
S-004543Commercial payer BDenied: eligibility or coverage16418016$235
S-004547Commercial payer BNot on file with payer16318017$245
S-006627Commercial payer ADenied: missing or invalid information729018$160
S-000433MedicareNot on file with payer34636519$160
S-006695Commercial payer ANot on file with payer689022$270

Filing limits vary by payer and by contract. The limits here are illustrative; a real report uses the limits in the practice’s own payer contracts.

4 Denial patterns

Denied claims not yet resolved, grouped by the reason the payer gave. Patterns point to fixes upstream, at registration, authorization or charge entry.

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Unresolved denials by reason
ReasonCARCClaimsBilled chargesNext step
Missing or invalid information1642$9,071Correct the claim and resubmit.
Eligibility or coverage2728$6,381Verify coverage and bill the right payer.
Bundling (included in another service)9721$4,663Check whether a modifier is supported; if not, write off.
Prior authorization missing19719$4,368Look for an authorization on file; appeal if one exists.
Medical necessity5018$3,633Review documentation and diagnosis coding before appealing.
Duplicate claim187$1,578Confirm the original was paid; usually no action.
Timely filing296$1,367Appeal only with proof of timely submission.
Total141$31,061

CARC is the standard claim adjustment reason code on the payer’s remittance. Each category shows the most common code.

5 Unbilled visits

Visits in the schedule with no claim sent: 117 visits, $24,432 in charges at the practice’s own rates.

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Unbilled visits by reason
ReasonVisitsOlder than 14 daysCharges
Visit note not yet signed6353$13,341
Charge not entered3837$7,555
Held for missing insurance details1616$3,536
Total117106$24,432

Visits from the last two weeks are often still being documented. Older unbilled visits need a decision: bill them before the payer’s filing limit, or record why they won’t be billed.

6 Coding review, in both directions

12 office visits reviewed against their documentation: 5 billed above what the documentation supports, 2 billed below it, and 5 that match.

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Coding review sample
EncounterProviderCode billedDocumentation supportsDirectionFinding
S-004269Provider C9921499213Above documentationDecision-making documented as low, not moderate.
S-004500Provider B9921499213Above documentationDecision-making documented as moderate, not high.
S-004734Provider A9921399213MatchesDocumentation supports the code billed.
S-005392Provider C9921399213MatchesDocumentation supports the code billed.
S-005462Provider A9921499213Above documentationDecision-making documented as low, not moderate.
S-005481Provider C9921499214MatchesDocumentation supports the code billed.
S-005662Provider B9921499213Above documentationTotal time documented falls short of the billed level.
S-006378Provider B9921499213Above documentationDecision-making documented as moderate, not high.
S-006532Provider B9921399213MatchesDocumentation supports the code billed.
S-006544Provider C9921399214Below documentationTotal time documented supports the higher level.
S-006596Provider B9921499214MatchesDocumentation supports the code billed.
S-006623Provider B9921399214Below documentationTotal time documented supports the higher level.

Over-coding carries a repayment obligation. Where the documentation supports a lower code than was billed, the practice may have been paid more than it was owed and may have a repayment obligation to the payer. The report flags these for correction just as clearly as visits billed below the documentation.

A small sample shows the format. It is not a coding error rate.

7 Payer participation

Enrollment status with each payer, for the practice as a group and for each provider individually.

Sample — fictional practice, illustrative figures. Participation status by payer
PayerGroup (practice)Provider AProvider BProvider CNext step
MedicareParticipatingParticipatingParticipatingParticipatingNo action needed.
Medicaid plan ANot enrolledNeeds verificationParticipatingParticipatingStart enrollment before sending this payer claims for anyone not enrolled.
Medicaid plan BParticipatingParticipatingNeeds verificationParticipatingConfirm status with the payer before the next claims go out.
Commercial payer ANeeds verificationNot enrolledParticipatingParticipatingStart enrollment before sending this payer claims for anyone not enrolled.
Commercial payer BNot enrolledParticipatingParticipatingParticipatingStart enrollment before sending this payer claims for anyone not enrolled.
Commercial payer CParticipatingParticipatingParticipatingParticipatingNo action needed.

Group enrollment and each provider’s individual enrollment are checked separately: a practice can be in network while one of its providers is not.

What this report can’t tell you

  • Whether a balance can still be collected depends on each claim’s history and the payer’s rules. Open balances here are listed so they can be worked, not counted as money owed.
  • Figures in a real report are estimates from the data reviewed. They are not guarantees of what will be collected.
  • A coding review looks at a sample of visits. It shows patterns to check, in both directions, not a precise error rate.

Let’s talk about your practice.

A conversation is the first step toward the right support.

Book a conversation ↗